ETVs gone in a fortnight
- Nick
- Admiral of the Blue
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
- Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
- Location: Oban. Scotland
- Contact:
ETVs gone in a fortnight
.
ETV (Emergency Towing Vessel) cover is to be withdrawn from the Minches and Shetland in fourteen days time because the government has deemed the £8m a year cost (which includes two vessels on the South Coast) 'bad value'.
The tugs were put in place after the Braer disaster in 1993. The costs of a single serious incident could wipe out the £8m savings at a stroke.
BBC report
ETV (Emergency Towing Vessel) cover is to be withdrawn from the Minches and Shetland in fourteen days time because the government has deemed the £8m a year cost (which includes two vessels on the South Coast) 'bad value'.
The tugs were put in place after the Braer disaster in 1993. The costs of a single serious incident could wipe out the £8m savings at a stroke.
BBC report
- Rowana
- Old Salt
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:58 pm
- Boat Type: Macwester Rowan 8 meter
- Location: Aberdeenshire
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
I'll just go and cancel my house insurance since said house hasn't burned down in the last 20 years
Same logic, is it not ? ?

Same logic, is it not ? ?
BLESSED ARE THOSE WHO ARE CRACKED,
FOR THEY ARE THE ONES WHO LET IN THE LIGHT
FOR THEY ARE THE ONES WHO LET IN THE LIGHT
- Nick
- Admiral of the Blue
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
- Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
- Location: Oban. Scotland
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
You should obviously be in gubbermint . . .Rowana wrote:I'll just go and cancel my house insurance since said house hasn't burned down in the last 20 years![]()
Same logic, is it not ? ?
- mm5aho
- Old Salt
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:40 pm
- Boat Type: Rival 32
- Location: West Lothian
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
"The costs of a single serious incident could wipe out the £8m savings at a stroke."
but would there be one of these each year?
Ignoring inflation that might have cost, since 1993, £144million?
but would there be one of these each year?
Ignoring inflation that might have cost, since 1993, £144million?
Geoff.
"Contender" Rival 32: Roseneath in winter, Mooring off Gourock in summer.
"Contender" Rival 32: Roseneath in winter, Mooring off Gourock in summer.
- Nick
- Admiral of the Blue
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
- Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
- Location: Oban. Scotland
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
The cost of the Exxon Valdez cleanup was $3 billionmm5aho wrote:"The costs of a single serious incident could wipe out the £8m savings at a stroke."
but would there be one of these each year?
Ignoring inflation that might have cost, since 1993, £144million?
The cost of the Prestige cleanup was $2.5 billion
How many years at £8 million would one of those pay for?
- W
-
- Old Salt
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 1:48 pm
- Boat Type: Victoria 26
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
There is some pretty good evidence, though, that these mind-blowingly expensive clean ups do more harm than good - more harm than the spill did in the first place. After the Braer, for example, one good winter storm basically cleaned everything up far less destructively than steam jets which (a) get rid of the oil and (b) sterilise everything they touch.Nick wrote: The cost of the Exxon Valdez cleanup was $3 billion
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
- Nick
- Admiral of the Blue
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
- Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
- Location: Oban. Scotland
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
It depends on the oil, the quantity and the location. In any event, I would like tol see your 'pretty good evidence - references please.ubergeekian wrote:There is some pretty good evidence, though, that these mind-blowingly expensive clean ups do more harm than good - more harm than the spill did in the first place. After the Braer, for example, one good winter storm basically cleaned everything up far less destructively than steam jets which (a) get rid of the oil and (b) sterilise everything they touch.Nick wrote: The cost of the Exxon Valdez cleanup was $3 billion
I am not sure I get your point though - are you saying we should just let tankers go aground and burst open then do nothing rather than station emergency vessels iin positions which might prevent this?
Rather a weak argument IMO.
- W
-
- Old Salt
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 1:48 pm
- Boat Type: Victoria 26
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
Edit: Nah, stuff it. I'm sick of on line arguments.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
- Nick
- Admiral of the Blue
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
- Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
- Location: Oban. Scotland
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
Don't start them thenubergeekian wrote:Edit: Nah, stuff it. I'm sick of on line arguments.

- claymore
- Admiral of the Green
- Posts: 4762
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 2:55 pm
- Boat Type: Claymore
- Location: Ardfern or Lancashire
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
Exactlymm5aho wrote:"The costs of a single serious incident could wipe out the £8m savings at a stroke."
but would there be one of these each year?
Ignoring inflation that might have cost, since 1993, £144million?
It's hardly likely to happen again.....is it?
Regards
Claymore

Claymore

-
- Old Salt
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 1:48 pm
- Boat Type: Victoria 26
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
One should always be wary of preparations for fighting the previous war.claymore wrote: It's hardly likely to happen again.....is it?
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
- Telo
- Admiral of the Red
- Posts: 2505
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:27 pm
- Boat Type: Vancouver 34 Pilot
- Location: Bampotterie-sur-mer
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
Yes. I don't know why that has to be the subject of an argument.ubergeekian wrote:After the Braer, for example, one good winter storm basically cleaned everything up...........
- Nick
- Admiral of the Blue
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
- Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
- Location: Oban. Scotland
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
Obviously the OP thinks letting drifting tankers go aground and break up is the best course of action, so no need for the ETVs.Shard wrote:Yes. I don't know why that has to be the subject of an argument.ubergeekian wrote:After the Braer, for example, one good winter storm basically cleaned everything up...........
- Telo
- Admiral of the Red
- Posts: 2505
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:27 pm
- Boat Type: Vancouver 34 Pilot
- Location: Bampotterie-sur-mer
- Contact:
Re: ETVs gone in a fortnight
Errm, no, Nick, Ian's not saying that at all; I think he is suggesting that there are situations where the stuff can disperse without the use of Fairy Liquid and all the damage that that can cause. I don't think it was he who was looking for an argument, just making an observation based on the case of the Braer.Nick wrote: Obviously the OP thinks letting drifting tankers go aground and break up is the best course of action, so no need for the ETVs.
Anyway, I thought you were the OP

This is all becoming too much for me........