Craobh Haven - should they???

Forum for general cruising topics
Post Reply
User avatar
Mark
Old Salt
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:16 pm

Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Mark »

There used to be a fantastic anchorage quite close to there, beautiful remote spot with shelter, good depths and fantastic scenery, so they had a bright idea and stuck a marina there and it was lost for ever.
Craobh Haven - should they have built it?

I know what I think, how about you?
User avatar
sahona
Admiral of the White
Posts: 1992
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:17 pm
Boat Type: Marcon Claymore
Location: Clyde

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by sahona »

First time we went there it was under guidance of my original blue CCC book, so I was most confused to find my intended anchorage all bricked up! This of course means that I was too late to experience the unspoilt beauty. (but I am quite young after all)
http://trooncruisingclub.org/ 20' - 30' Berths available, Clyde.
Cruising, racing, maintenance facilities. Go take a look, you know you want to.
User avatar
Nick
Admiral of the Blue
Posts: 5927
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
Location: Oban. Scotland
Contact:

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Nick »

.
I have been told that retaining part of the anchorage was a condition of planning permission and that the area S. of the pontoons is in fact that anchorage:

Image

I have not tested this. If anyone does then I am sure we will all be interested to hear the response of the marina owners.
- Nick 8)

Image
User avatar
Telo
Admiral of the Red
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:27 pm
Boat Type: Vancouver 34 Pilot
Location: Bampotterie-sur-mer
Contact:

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Telo »

Nick, are you in Australia?
User avatar
Mark
Old Salt
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Mark »

Nick wrote:I have been told that retaining part of the anchorage was a condition of planning permission and that the area S. of the pontoons is in fact that anchorage:
Plausible. Plenty of room there in 5-10m.
Nick wrote:I have not tested this. If anyone does then I am sure we will all be interested to hear the response of the marina owners.
Hard to imagine they'd object and hard to imagine they'd be able to enforce it if they did. I'm half tempted to phone and ask.

If you're going to suffer all the Marina drawbacks you might as well be able to get off the boat for a dump so I doubt anyone ever would anchor there.
User avatar
Nick
Admiral of the Blue
Posts: 5927
Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
Location: Oban. Scotland
Contact:

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Nick »

Shard wrote:Nick, are you in Australia?
It's called 'course up' Donald . . . very fashionable with the plotterati.
- Nick 8)

Image
User avatar
Telo
Admiral of the Red
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:27 pm
Boat Type: Vancouver 34 Pilot
Location: Bampotterie-sur-mer
Contact:

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Telo »

Hmm. So, do you have turn it the other way round if you want to go back out again?
User avatar
Mark
Old Salt
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Mark »

Shard wrote:Hmm. So, do you have turn it the other way round if you want to go back out again?
Reverse out.
User avatar
aquaplane
Admiral of the White Rose
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 12:55 pm
Boat Type: Jeanneau Espace
Location: Body: West Yorks; Boat: Tayvallich

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by aquaplane »

Mark wrote:
Shard wrote:Hmm. So, do you have turn it the other way round if you want to go back out again?
Reverse out.
Not in a Vega you won't.
Seminole.
Cheers Bob.
User avatar
Mark
Old Salt
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by Mark »

http://www.scottishboating.blogspot.com/ wrote:Several comments decried the loss of wonderful natural harbours such as Craobh. A fellow called Quandary used to anchor there in the 1970s and as it happens so did I. I entirely agree with these comments, which only underline the need for proper regulation of the use of the seabed. A quite magical, remote cluster of little islands has been ruined by a garish pastiche of a village.
Now this is the kind of emphatic comment that I was looking for.

How many jobs should have been sacrificed to retain a pretty anchorage though?
User avatar
DaveS
Yellow Admiral
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 1:10 am
Boat Type: Seastream 34
Location: Me: Falkirk, Boat: Craobh

Re: Craobh Haven - should they???

Post by DaveS »

I've been keeping out of this so far since, as a Craobh berth holder of around 15 years, I've obviously got a vested interest. I entirely agree about the pastiche comment - East Neuk style craw stepped gables look extremely odd on the West Coast ! And yet, as a marina, Craobh works well. For me Dunstaffnage would be a more convenient base, both from it's less tidally constrained location and reduced driving time / distance, but Craobh is better sheltered and generally more pleasant IMHO so I've never been seriously tempted to move.

I did not experience the pre-marina anchorage, so can only imagine what was lost. The current marina is, however, providing a popular service judging from the number of visitors, and it provides employment in an area not overly provided with opportunities. While we certainly don't want the West Coast to approach anything like the Solent, I think having a modest number of moderate sized and well located marinas is, on balance, a Good Thing.
Image ⚓
Post Reply