Many of you that visit YBW Scuttlebutt will of course have read the threads on the Conservancy campaign to declare Marine Conservation Zones within UK Coastal Waters. The goal of these is laudable - preserving UK marine life is something that I think we can all agree is a great idea. However, many of the restrictions that are being proposed have a very high impact on boaters in coastal areas, in particular a number of areas have been designated as potential sites for a blanket ban on anchoring.
The most significant of these, and indeed the test case, is Studland Bay. Studland is of course a highly popular anchorage in the UK South Coast, offering in a small part protection from even Southerly and Easterly weather from the Channel, and having no tidal gate. It is also an area of stunning natural beauty that is a very desired cruising destination in its own right.
Discussions and "data collection" have been under way for the past 18 months - however, this process has had precious little representation from the actual boating community. The Royal Yacht Association (RYA) has been involved as a stakeholder, but their attitude has been more one of "partnering" with the Conservancy movement rather than objecting. Indeed, many of their video presentations to the boating community smack of "this is coming, and really it is good for you", rather than questioning the need for it in the first place.
UK marine biologists working for the Conservancy movement have indeed admitted that eel grass and seahorses (the two threatened organisms) are actually flourishing in Studland Bay, and have been for decades of growth in numbers and coverage. But that has not stopped the movement for a ban on anchoring, because of POTENTIAL damage from anchors to the eel grass - those same anchors that have been in use in Studland for the past 3 decades while the grass has grown and grown!
The Boat Owners Response Group is an informal group of activists that have decided that UK leisure boaters needed a more robust voice in the process. For the past 3 months, we have been working to publicize the imminent dates of decisions and proposals, drafts of which are being circulated and considered which include proposed anchor bans in several areas of the UK, not just Studland Bay. We have been directing much of our energy on YBW, because that is where we met, and we have established the start of our own web site. As we have evolved, we have become a closer partner to the RYA, and due to our messaging campaign have now been invited to the Finding Sanctuary discussion process as legitimate stakeholders in our own right - representing UK boat owners in concert with the RYA. We have also had very positive coverage in both Yachting Monthly and Practical Boat Owner.
I'm coming to you today because we have posted a poll on our website, one designed to seek out opinions on anchorage rights. It's a simple poll - "Do you believe Studland Bay should be a No Anchore Zone?". Originally, flow from YBW generated a positive flood of NO votes. Then the Conservancy forums got wind of it, and have flooded it with YES votes, pushing for a ban. This is a public poll, and is being monitored closely by both sides.
I am here to ask you to spend a minute, pop over to the BORG website, and vote NO to a ban on Anchorage rights. Even if you never cruise Studland, it is only the first test case, many others have been proposed in the current drafts of MCZs.
You can find the poll and our website at http://www.boatownersresponsegroup.com. Please feel free to pass this on to as many boaters and boating forums as you can...we need all the help we can get.
Regards,
SailBob
Help Save Studland Bay - anchorage rights!
Re: Help Save Studland Bay - anchorage rights!
My gardener tells that if my grass is strong and well rooted, it will easily withstand his machine which digs holes and lifts moss. Therefore, I blame all of this kerfuffle on these new fangled anchors which do actually set, not something my CQR has ever done, and thus digs the grass out.
I hope that casting a vote in your poll doesn't have the same result as in the conservation poll whose site spams me with mail telling me that anchors are no longer shagging the sea horses due to my support which is quite the opposite of what I voted for ...
I hope that casting a vote in your poll doesn't have the same result as in the conservation poll whose site spams me with mail telling me that anchors are no longer shagging the sea horses due to my support which is quite the opposite of what I voted for ...
- claymore
- Admiral of the Green
- Posts: 4762
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 2:55 pm
- Boat Type: Claymore
- Location: Ardfern or Lancashire
Re: Help Save Studland Bay - anchorage rights!
Quite
and where were all they Studlanders when we were fighting fish farms?
Personally - I don't like horses.
and where were all they Studlanders when we were fighting fish farms?
Personally - I don't like horses.
Regards
Claymore

Claymore

- Arghiro
- Old Salt
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 12:54 pm
- Boat Type: Pentland Ketch
- Location: Midlands
Re: Help Save Studland Bay - anchorage rights!
They are very tasty if cooked properly.claymore wrote:(snip)Personally - I don't like horses.
- Nick
- Admiral of the Blue
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Sun May 12, 2002 4:11 pm
- Boat Type: Albin Vega 27 and Morgan Giles 30
- Location: Oban. Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Help Save Studland Bay - anchorage rights!
.
Sorry Bob, forgot to mention they are all barking on here
Sorry Bob, forgot to mention they are all barking on here

- claymore
- Admiral of the Green
- Posts: 4762
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 2:55 pm
- Boat Type: Claymore
- Location: Ardfern or Lancashire
Re: Help Save Studland Bay - anchorage rights!
Horses whinney or neigh or something
Dogs bark
Horse does taste better than dog.
Dogs bark
Horse does taste better than dog.
Regards
Claymore

Claymore
