BLUEMOMENT

He has disappeared into the void!

All of a sudden I started receiving emails notifying of every post, changed a few options, did'nt work so thort sod it, I'll change my email addie to a genuine looking one that did'nt exist .. that worked but kicked me off into the ether .. Help!

.
Well done Jim - in the entire history of the board no-one else has ever managed to deactivate their account.

As you can see I have re-activated it, but in the process the password has been changed. Your new password is 'password' - so get on there pronto and change it, I'll give you 5 mins then change it to something more sensible if you haven't.

This is me as Jim.R logging out now.

.
If you change your e-mail address you are required to re-activate your account. If the email address doesn't exist that is a bit difficult. If you ever want to do that then create a temporary, real and accessible e-mail account, activate your account then delete then e-mail account. I've activated your account manually in this instance. Have you changed your password yet?

Changed it, thank you

.
Nae worries. Going to get away from the PC for a while, don't touch anything while I'm gone

are you back yet??? can we play????

i spy with my little eye something beginning with p

jim.r wrote:i spy with my little eye something beginning with p

Is it 'Day'?????









Well doesn't every day begin with a P?

I'll have you know I'm an IT professional, laddie!

We know. That's what's worrying us.

I suspect I'm a mere amateur at screwing things compared to our outosurcing colleagues in after S but before U - Systems!

This will really amuse you!

Jimi of TOTP is no more! I changed my email to a non email a couple of years ago to stop getting spam. However it would appear my rant generated rant at Nats was not taken in the spirit is was intended and my password has either been changed or my account disabled.

Worse things have happened

.
I see Jimi has been using the rant-o-matic again. I got banned for a week once for using it.

- W

Sensitive are they? Or has he just lost another cookie after the clean-up?

Arghiro wrote:Sensitive are they? Or has he just lost another cookie after the clean-up?

Some of us have suspected for a while that Jim may be a cookie short of a jar.