Page 2 of 3
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:08 am
by jim.r
The way I see it is that the liability on a mooring only materialises if negligence in the maintenance of the mooring can be proved. These terms do not, IMHO, exclude such liability. So behind the words I cannot see that there is any real difference from normal moorings. I rather suspect these people will be scraping a living from a very short season, so for a facility to remain on Sanda then every penny counts (including money towards the cost of maintaining moorings).
BTW if you feel referring to me as a Solent sailor is geographically valid, on the same rationale I'd feel justified in calling you a Morecambe Bay sailor..
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:16 am
by Nick
.
'Scraping a living' - geezabrek Jimi, this is a wealthy foreigner buying up a chunk of Scotland and trying to restrict access to the land. Michi Meier is described as a 'Swiss tycoon' and bought Sanda for about £2.5 million, not most peoples' idea of scraping . . .
You've been down there too long - come awa hame and regain some perspective man!
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:07 am
by jim.r
Nick wrote:.
'Scraping a living' - geezabrek Jimi, this is a wealthy foreigner buying up a chunk of Scotland and trying to restrict access to the land. Michi Meier is described as a 'Swiss tycoon' and bought Sanda for about £2.5 million, not most peoples' idea of scraping . . .
You've been down there too long - come awa hame and regain some perspective man!
Hmmm..so foreign investment is'nt welcome? The website which states visiting yachts are welcome does'nt seem terribly restrictive to me!
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:55 am
by Nick
jim.r wrote:Hmmm..so foreign investment is'nt welcome? The website which states visiting yachts are welcome does'nt seem terribly restrictive to me!
It isn't 'foreign investment', it is a Swiss tycoon buying a Scottish island because he fancies it then trying to restrict access because he doesn't understand Scots law.
You are entitled to your opinion, but as I said, you have lived down there too long. We are used to our right to roam and anchor at will up here, and although the new owners' behaviour is the norm on the S. Coast - indeed would no doubt be seen as magnanimous - many Scottish sailors won't see it that way.
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:03 pm
by marisca
If memories go back to previous threads on Sanda, the website and the very large painted notice were taken as an indication that yachties (or any other hoi polloi) were not welcome, thus my OP on this thread commenting on a softening of the website attitude.
The bald wording is that yachts are welcome in the bay - try to stop us! - and yachties paying £10 for a mooring are welcome in the restaurant - whether anchoring yachties are welcome we shall have to wait and see.

Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:54 pm
by wully
claymore wrote: if the wee lassie wid let me slip her a crippler.....
Closest you'd get is slipping a disc....
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:27 pm
by Old_Glow_In_The_Deep
ubergeekian wrote:jim.r wrote:Also, name one place where liability is accepted for moorings.
Absolutely everywhere, I'd have bloody well thought. If I am paying for a mooring then I expect the people providing it to take liability for the state of the equipment and to have public liability insurance.
There was a little confusion at the OG Croft when they said we’ll charge but accept no liability.
I might be a visitor there myself this season …. & I do hope there’s a mooring, as I don’t like to anchor & leave the boat (yet).
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:32 pm
by Old_Glow_In_The_Deep
jim.r wrote:a Morecambe Bay sailor..
What’s wrong with being a ‘Morecambe Bay Sailor’ …… some great people from that part of the sea / neck of the woods.

Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:55 pm
by jim.r
Nothing wrong with sailors from Morecambe Bay , I would'nt be so puerile as to insult fellow sailors based on their geograpical location, cultural heritage, genetic origin or domicile of choice! Rather I would celebrate our shared interests and rejoice in the sense of community where working together creates a bigger cake for us all to have a share of!
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:24 pm
by claymore
As a Morecambe Bay sailor, I...er.....hmmm.

Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:46 pm
by Booby Trapper
sahona wrote:Because they won't hear the engine, so might miss running out with the till.
It's called stealth mooring, und zae haf vais of stopping zis.
Edit : Oops, I can't go there now, even if I wanted to!
For you Tommy ze summer eez over
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:46 am
by ubergeekian
Old_Glow_In_The_Deep wrote:
What’s wrong with being a ‘Morecambe Bay Sailor’
I suspect it's a bit like being a Solway sailor. Fine when the tide's in, sand as far as the eye can see when it's out. Been there, done that, got the 45-degree-inclined t-shirt.
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:48 am
by sahona
[quote="Booby Trapper
For you Tommy ze summer eez over[/quote]
A bit like last time we met?
Hope not.
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:34 am
by Mark
Nick wrote:We are used to our right to roam and anchor at will up here
Yet, when Bill Cowie started to charge for anchoring in "Acarsaid Mor" and allegedly threatened to fill the place with moorings you were right behind him. (Although IIRC the charge turned out not be for Anchoring after all, but for use of his slipway.)
Re: Sanda - The latest attitude
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:28 pm
by claymore
Can't wait for the justification to come through on that one Billy boy!